Chocolate Works Residents’ Association
Newsletter, November 2024
Many thanks to those of you who attended the CWRA open meeting on November 13th. For those of you unable to attend the meeting, here is an update on the issues discussed.
Outstanding snagging issues
As you will be aware, there are a number of outstanding snagging issues that remain unresolved. Last week representatives from the CWRA and Watson PM spent several hours inspecting the site to create an up-to-date snagging list. Joe Langan from Watson PM agreed to produce the revised and updated list. Once received, I shall look at sharing this with members, subject to any confidentiality issues that may arise. My feeling, as Chair, is that there should be few, if any, confidentiality issues that arise but we have to have this position confirmed.
I expect Watson PM to both inspect the site regularly to identify any new snagging issues that arise and to provide updates on actions taken to have the issues resolved. To this end I plan to meet with Joe Langan, along with other members of the Committee, on a monthly basis where we go through the snagging list so that progress can be assessed. I will invite David Wilson Homes to send a representative to the meetings as most of the outstanding issues are the responsibility of David Wilson Homes.
The Committee would ask one thing from you: if you identify a problem on the estate that needs to be resolved, can you please bring it to the attention of the Committee by emailing details to admin@cwra.co.uk. We can ensure that it is added to the snagging list. For leaseholders who have problems with their apartments, you will need to inform Watson PM directly but, if you are willing, please also copy to CWRA so that we can add it to the snagging list to ensure that action is taken.
There is a problem with roofs on the estate. You will have noticed that there has been an escalation in the erection of scaffolding and much of that is related to leaking roofs. I was told by the scaffolders that they are to erect scaffolding around Cocoa House and Hallmark House so that their roofs can be repaired. This is to be confirmed. As the site is nearing its 10th birthday, the warranties on the roofs will be scheduled to expire. Therefore, the Committee is going to look at the costs of having the roofs inspected to check their condition and whether any action is necessary before the warranties expire. We will come back to you with potential costs and further information.
Establishment of the new Management Company
There is nothing of substance to report on this matter. David Wilson Homes has gone silent on this issue. I have written again to them asking for a meeting to discuss this and other issues. I shall let you know of progress.
Landscaping
The vice-Chair and I met with Aspects, the company responsible for the landscaping of the estate, to discuss their experience of working on this site for a whole season. We were persuaded by the argument that bringing the estate up to scratch would take more than one year and are satisfied about their approach and progress.
You may recall that we submitted a planning proposal to erect a fence on the Bishopthorpe Road border of the estate, running roughly from the Nursing Home to the current laurel bushes. That planning proposal has not yet been granted with the planners unhappy with aspects of the original proposal and suggesting some changes.
In the meantime, we had a meeting with the tree surgeon following the necessary tree survey. The tree survey indicated that the leylandii on that boundary need regular attention and, even then, they may need to be cut down in the relatively foreseeable future. Until they are felled, assuming that they are, there will be a cost to the estate of around £3,000 per year for their maintenance!
There is an option is to have the leylandii felled now, improve the soil, and then plant a laurel hedge with specimen trees behind it. In that case, we would not need to erect the metal fence as currently planned, and costed at around £10,000. Obviously, this new proposal would cost additional money. The current estimates (guesstimates?) of the cost of this work is that it would cost around £25-30,000. That would indicate a funding gap of £15-20,000, a payback period of seven years. Speaking to Joe Langan from Watson PM, I can confirm that there does exist a sinking fund (like a reserve fund) which may be used to partially offset the costs.
The open meeting on Wednesday took the view that it would like the Committee to investigate further this second option. The next steps are for us to obtain more accurate costs, consider the issues involved in felling the leylandii and planting the new bushes and trees, identify potential options and potential funding sources. A big step will be to consider what planning restrictions may apply and, if there are, reflect on the implications. Once this has been completed, I will ensure the production of an information pack providing this information to all residents. Look out for this in the new year.
Parking
Many thanks to those who submitted a return to the parking survey. My apologies to those who did not receive the survey. I relied on Watson PM to distribute the survey as they hold a better distribution list. Unfortunately, they were not able to distribute it to residents in Orange House or Devon House as well as a small number of other residents. On this second point, you will note that Watson PM has recently sent correspondence asking residents to inform Watson PM if there are any changes to contact details. I understand that with over 300 properties it has difficulty keeping an up-to-date contacts list.
I distributed my thematic analysis of the results of the survey previously. Peter Lees, Gary Cole and I met with Joe Langan and Steve Scarborough (from Bay Sentry) to discuss the results on Friday 15th November. At this point we will have to wait to see how sympathetic Steve Scarborough is to our collective views while recognising that Steve does not have the ability to accede to all our requests.
In the new year we will conduct a further survey of all Chocolate Works residents on possible proposals relating to our parking arrangements.
Developing interaction between the Management Committee and CWRA members
There was a discussion on how the Committee can work better with members and what would members like from the Committee. The Committee will consider the suggestions and take appropriate action. Members liked the newsletters and the open meetings and we shall certainly continue with these as the minimum. Once the Committee has discussed this further, we shall provide detail on proposed changes.
Update on meetings with Watson PM
Peter Lees and I recently met with Daniel Carrick, director of Watson PM. It was a helpful meeting. My takeaways from the meeting were:
- Daniel stressed the importance of the Chocolate Works site to Watson PM’s portfolio.
- Daniel agreed that there should be a fresh start on all issues, which should be tabulated. This is in effect the snagging and associated issues list. He would want to receive a copy of the revised list so that he can oversee action from the perspective of Watson PM.
- He agreed that Joe Langan should meet with me and the vice-Chair monthly, to discuss the snagging list and other issues that arise.
Finally …
We now have some 240 residents signed up as members which is nearly 75% of all residences. This is an improvement on the situation that existed a year ago. But please, when speaking to your neighbours, ask if they are members and, if not, please encourage them to join.
Happy Holidays!
I suspect that this will be the last newsletter for this year. Have a great Christmas and New Year holiday season.